Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Peter Nissler's avatar

Your writing and musings are really so well done. Makes me rethink some of my impressions, my ideas and opinions that sometimes occur in a knee-jerk fashion without substantial support or taking a little time to assess what really happened. Was he shot? If he was it was at an angle that kept the probability of penetration really low. It was aGRAZING shot that ultimately ended far away from the site. The speculations that have surfaced are really questionable. Some are speculating on 3 shooters. The number of audible shots some have counted are closer to 14. This number of shots could not have been done by only 1 shooter. If he was shot by the guy on the roof then he would have had to have been facing the shooter head-on. I'm not so sure that was the case. The injury had to have been caused by a bullet that was heading toward him face on. The amount of blood that was seen is not surprising because the amount of blood that is circulated in that area is necessary to keep that vital part of the body well fed. There are too many unanswered questions that haven't been answered yet. It is really a tradjedy that these kind of occurances are happening so frequently. I so enjoy your writings and feel guilty that I am not reading as much as I could . Hope our paths cross some day!

Expand full comment
Jenny Davis's avatar

Hello, Sue---Thank you for your beautiful writing and perspective. I needed to hear this today.

Jenny Davis

Expand full comment
5 more comments...

No posts